A- de 2021
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Harold Eduardo Sua Montaño
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de suspensión del proceso de la referencia por prejudicialidad.
La Corte reiteró lo resuelto en el Auto 341/21 adoptado dentro del expediente D-13839, en el que se consideró que la petición de prejudicialidad presentada también por el aquí memorialista era manifiestamente improcedente y, procedió a RECHAZARLA con los mismos argumentos expuestos en el precitado Auto.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por ser manifiestamente improcedente, la solicitud de declarar la prejudicialidad, efectuada por el ciudadano Harold Eduardo Sua Montana, en el tramite de los expedientes D-13922 y D-13928.
- SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.